On March 22 at 10:10am the Environmental Justice Principles proposed by the Minority Citizens Advisory Committee (MCAC) of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) will go before the full MTC Commission for adoption. An alternative, weaker version of EJ Principles proposed by the MTCs General Counsel will also go before the Commission.
Please call the MTC’s Commissioners and urge them to adopt the MCAC’s Environmental Justice Principles as they are. Their contact information is below.
Rubin, Jon San Francisco Mayor's Appointee San Francisco (650) 873-1200 email@example.com
McClemore, John Former City of Santa Clara Coun Santa Clara County Cities (408) 261-9431 firstname.lastname@example.org
Ammiano, Tom San Francisco Board of Superviso SF City and County (415) 554-5144 email@example.com
Anderson, Irma Mayor, City of Richmond Contra Costa County Cities (510) 620-6503 firstname.lastname@example.org
Azumbrado, Tom Director for Project Managemen US Department of Housing & Urban Development (415) 489-6618 Thomas_W._Azumbrado@HUD.GOVt, HUD
Beall, James T; Jr. Santa Clara County Board of Sup Santa Clara County (408) 299-5040 email@example.com
Blanchard, Bob Vice-Mayor, City of Santa Rosa Sonoma County and Cities (707) 543-3010 firstname.lastname@example.org
DeSaulnier, Mark Contra Costa County Board of Su Contra Costa County (925) 646-5763 email@example.com
Dodd, Bill Napa County Board of Supervisor Napa County (707) 259-8278 firstname.lastname@example.org Giacopini,
Dorene M. Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter, DO US Department of Transportation (510) 758-0553 email@example.comT
Haggerty, Scott Alameda County Board of Superv Alameda County (510) 272-6691 firstname.lastname@example.org
Halsted, Anne W. SF Bay Conservation & Develop SF Bay Conservation & Development Commissioahalsted@aol.comment Commissionn (415) 352-3600
Kinsey, Steve Marin County Board of Superviso Marin County (415) 499-7331 email@example.com
Lempert, Sue Councilmember, City of San Mat San Mateo County Cities (650) 522-7522 x6268 firstname.lastname@example.org
Tissier, Adrienne Supervisor, San Mateo County San Mateo County (650) 363-4572 email@example.com
Sartipi, Bijan Caltrans, District 4 Director State Business, Transportation & Housing Agenc (510) 286-5900 firstname.lastname@example.org
Spering, James P. Mayor, Suisun City Solano County and Cities (707) 421-7300 email@example.com
Torliatt, Pamela Councilmember, City of Petalum Association of Bay Area Governments (707) 778-4345 firstname.lastname@example.org
Young, Sheila Mayor, City of San Leandro Alameda County Cities (510) 577-3355 email@example.com
MARCH 22 10 A.M.
Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter
Why you should call the Commissioners and come out in support of the principles!On Friday, March 3 the MCAC’s EJ Principles went before the MTC’s Legislation Committee for adoption. This constituted the fourth time that the MCAC’s EJ principles were submitted for consideration. The Committee moved to forward both the MCAC and the General Counsel’s language to the full commission without recommendation after failing to pass a motion to adopt the MCAC principles.
The MCAC has been working for the past year and a half on drafting their proposed set of EJ principles. The MCAC adopted these principles late in 2004, and voted to submit them to the Commission for its consideration and approval more than a year ago. At that time, however, the Commissioners refused, claiming that the principles wrongly implied that MTC’s distribution of funding was discriminatory.
In January of this year, due to concerns raised by the Congestion Management Agencies and the Bay Area Partnership, the MTC’s Legislation Committee decided to further postpone the adoption of the EJ principles and requested that the MCAC meet with the Bay Area Partnership “to determine if mutually acceptable language could be achieved.” This joint meeting was convened on February 3, 2006 where modified language was discussed, but no action was taken since neither the MCAC nor the Partnership had a quorum present at the meeting.
At its regular meeting on February 14 the MCAC decided to stand by its principles and voted to retain the original language because MCAC members believe that the language modification to Principles 3 and 4 would render them meaningless. Therefore, the MCAC requested that the Legislation Committee approve them at its March 3 meeting. As a result, the General Counsel was asked to comment on whether adoption of the EJ principles would increase liability risks for the MTC but all he did was to edit the principles and effectively weaken them without providing a legal analysis or rationale.
Let the MTC Commission hear your support on behalf of the MCAC’s EJ Principles and hope to see you at the March 22 meeting!